Weronika Ewald vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Jun at 09:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Ewald vs C. Meligeni Alves

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ewald 1 - 0 Alves
They have played 2 sets in total, with Weronika Ewald winning 2 and Carolina Meligeni Alves winning 0. The last match between Weronika Ewald and Carolina Meligeni Alves was at the W35 Perigueux, 27-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Weronika Ewald getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ewald | 1 |
| Alves | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Perigueux(06-27-25)
W. Ewald vs C. M. Alves H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $130,308 |
| 60.32% (76-50) | Career Total W/L | 57.72% (441-323) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
W. Ewald vs C. M. Alves Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Alves has a slightly better second serve success rate at 39.63% compared to Ewald's 37.14%. Could this give Alves an edge in close games?
- Return Game: Alves excels in returning first serves, winning 35.88% of points, superior to Ewald's 31.44%. Yet, Ewald marginally leads on second serve returns with 53.14% over Alves' 52.02%.
- Handling Pressure: Favoring Alves, he successfully saves 46.29% of breakpoints, versus Ewald’s 44.85%.
- Match Performance: Over the past year, Alves exhibits a higher match win rate at 63.53%, slightly ahead of Ewald's 60.87%.
- Surface Strength: Alves performs best on clay with a 60% win rate, while Ewald excels on hard surfaces, winning 63% of matches. Will the choice of surface impact the outcome?
- Competition Level: Over the year, Alves has a stronger performance in Challenger/ITF events, winning 65.38% of matches compared to Ewald's 57.58%.
- Opposition Quality: The average rank of opponents for both players is similar, with Alves facing slightly better-ranked players.
- Deciding Set Performance: Alves holds a slender edge in clutch deciders, winning 56% of them, just above Ewald's 54%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Both players have a comparable breakpoint conversion rate, with Alves at 40.58% and Ewald at 39.9%. Can either capitalize on crucial chances?
Editorial Prediction (June 27, 2025, UTC):
Through the lens of recent form and detailed performance analysis, Alves exhibits numerous slight advantages over Ewald. His consistency in transforming challenging serves and sustaining poise under duress signals a potential upper hand.
Despite Ewald's slight edge in converting second serve returns and performing optimally on hard courts, the comprehensive performance metrics tilt favorably towards Alves, especially in handling breakpoints and navigating deciding sets.
In conclusion, considering the documented data and player tendencies, Alves emerges as the probable victor in this upcoming encounter.
Weronika Ewald vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Ewald vs C. M. Alves H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:25:49 | Average Match Time | 1:25:49 |
| 54% (26/48) | 1st Serve % | 63% (36/57) |
| 77% (20/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (21/36) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 19% (4/21) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 56% (32/57) | Return Points Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Ewald Recent Matches Played
C. M. Alves Recent Matches Played

W. Ewald vs C. M. Alves Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.32% (76/50) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.72% (441/323) |
| 58.45% (166/118) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.49% (979/754) |
| 54.21% (1405/1187) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (8300/7350) |
| 61.11% (44/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.09% (41/52) |
| 61.90% (26/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.85% (398/267) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 213 | Aces Total | 515 |
| 0.52 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 655 | Total Double Faults | 1431 |
| 1:37:8 | Average Match Time | 1:24:57 |
| 450.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.69 |
| 60% (4743/7896) | 1st Serve % | 69% (28290/41027) |
| 62% (2946/4743) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (16519/28290) |
| 44% (1391/3153) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5846/12737) |
| 50% (560/1119) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2841/5652) |
| 48% (3875/8018) | Return Points Win % | 48% (20012/41625) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 70.00% (7/3) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 52.86% (37/33) | Challenger W/L | 55.07% (266/217) |
| 72.22% (39/15) | Futures W/L | 66.52% (155/78) |
| 60% (75/125) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (432/753) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 42% (8/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (74/142) |
| 55% (18/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/206) |
| 92% (72/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (433/381) |
| 8% (72/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (433/52) |
| 19% (54/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (331/58) |